This section shares available socio-demographic data on the diversity of groups on each of the four pathways used to develop talent in the OPS:

  • coaching and mentoring programs
  • leadership development programs
  • succession plans
  • recruitment shortlists

Please reference the 2020 Annual Progress Report on Senior Leadership Diversification in the OPS for additional information on the OPS’ pathways to leadership.

In this section, socio-demographic data is presented for women, non-binary and/or Two-Spirit, Francophone, LGBTQ+, transgender, persons with disabilities, Indigenous. Black and racialized respondents for each pathway. Data is also disaggregated for gender, sexual orientation, and race. Disaggregated data for Indigenous people (such as, First Nations, Inuk and/or Métis) is not displayed due to small sample sizes.

Data collection was conducted by various program areas and at different points in time depending on the pathway. The questions and response categories used to collect socio-demographic information about individuals were the same as are used in the OPS Employee Experience Survey. See Appendix B for notes on these categories.

Results offer an OPS-wide picture since data collection began in each pathway. Each ministry’s breakdown looks different and ministries are setting targets based on their own results rather than on the OPS-wide results presented in this report. Given the variety of contexts that ministries are working within (for example, geography, labour markets, client populations), ministries are also encouraged to account for ministry-specific factors when developing annual plans.

Socio-demographic profile of participants in Diversity Career Champions Program, 2018-2020

These visualizations show the proportion of participants in the OPS’ Diversity Career Champions Program (DCCP), broken down by socio-demographic group, for the last three program cycles.
Note: This figure is for visual reference only. See the tables below this figure for the full data.

Women

2018

72.4%

2019

69.6%

2020

72.5%

Men

2018

24.5%

2019

27.6%

2020

26.6%

Non-binary and/or Two-Spirit

2018

0.5%

2019

0.4%

2020

1.2%

Francophone

2018

8.3%

2019

6.0%

2020

7.2%

Indigenous

2018

2.5%

2019

1.9%

2020

3.3%

LGBTQ+

2018

11.7%

2019

11.0%

2020

13.1%

Asexual

2018

1.2%

2019

2.9%

2020

2.3%

Bisexual

2018

2.4%

2019

1.7%

2020

3.2%

Gay

2018

4.2%

2019

3.8%

2020

3.7%

Lesbian

2018

2.0%

2019

1.3%

2020

1.4%

Pansexual

2018

0.3%

2019

0.2%

2020

0.6%

Queer

2018

0.6%

2019

1.4%

2020

2.2%

Questioning

2018

0.9%

2019

0.3%

2020

0.9%

Two-spirit

2018

0.0%

2019

0.0%

2020

0.2%

Transgender

2018

N/A

2019

N/A

2020

0.9%

I don’t identify with the above

2018

0.2%

2019

0.2%

2020

0.0%

Straight or heterosexual

2018

74.6%

2019

75.0%

2020

75.6%

Persons with disabilities

2018

10.8%

2019

8.4%

2020

10.8%

Racialized

2018

62.2%

2019

64.8%

2020

63.0%

Black

2018

15.9%

2019

12.9%

2020

16.4%

East / Southeast Asian

2018

19.5%

2019

19.3%

2020

17.5%

Middle Eastern

2018

5.0%

2019

3.8%

2020

3.9%

Latino / Latina / Latinx

2018

2.6%

2019

1.8%

2020

3.6%

South Asian

2018

18.6%

2019

21.0%

2020

23.6%

Another race category

2018

1.5%

2019

7.5%

2020

3.0%

White

2018

29.9%

2019

28.0%

2020

30.6%

The following table shares the proportion of participants in the OPS’ Diversity Career Champions Program (DCCP), broken down by socio-demographic group, for the last three program cycles.

OPS socio-demographic profile of participants in Diversity Career Champions Program, 2018-2020
OPS socio-demographic profile of participants in Diversity Career Champions Program, 2018-2020 Ontario labour force 2016/2017 OPS 2018 OPS 2019 OPS 2021 DCCP participants 2018 DCCP participants 2019 DCCP participants 2020

Gender identity

Men 51.7% 39.5% 40.9% 38.9% 24.5% 27.6% 26.6%
Non-Binary and/or Two-Spirit N/A 0.4% 0.4% 0.6% 0.5% 0.4% 1.2%
Women 48.3% 60.1% 58.8% 60.6% 72.4% 69.6% 72.5%
Francophone 4.0% 7.1% 6.9% 6.9% 8.3% 6.0% 7.2%
LGBTQ+ N/A 11.8% 13.0% 12.2% 11.7% 11.0% 13.1%

Sexual orientation

Straight or Heterosexual 97.3% 88.2% 87.0% 87.1% 74.6% 75.0% 75.6%
Asexual Not applicable 4.9% 6.4% 5.8% 1.2% 2.9% 2.3%
Bisexual Not applicable 1.9% 2.0% 2.7% 2.4% 1.7% 3.2%
Gay Not applicable 1.8% 1.7% 1.8% 4.2% 3.8% 3.7%
Lesbian Not applicable 1.0% 0.9% 0.9% 2.0% 1.3% 1.4%
Pansexual Not applicable N/A 0.3% 0.5% 0.3% 0.2% 0.6%
Queer Not applicable N/A 0.4% 0.7% 0.6% 1.4% 2.2%
Questioning Not applicable 0.3% 0.3% 0.4% 0.9% 0.3% 0.9%
Two-Spirit Not applicable N/A 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2%
Transgender N/A N/A N/A 0.4% N/A N/A 0.9%
Persons with disabilities 16.7% 12.1% 13.2% 13.2% 10.8% 8.4% 10.8%
Indigenous 2.5% 2.6% 2.8% 2.6% 2.5% 1.9% 3.3%
Racialized 28.3% 22.8% 23.2% 25.4% 62.2% 64.8% 63.0%

Race categories

Black 4.5% 5.4% 5.2% 5.9% 15.9% 12.9% 16.4%
East/Southeast Asian 9.9% 7.9% 8.1% 8.6% 19.5% 19.3% 17.5%
Latino/Latina/Latinx 1.7% 1.4% 1.5% 1.5% 2.6% 1.8% 3.6%
Middle Eastern 2.3% 1.7% 1.8% 1.9% 5.0% 3.8% 3.9%
South Asian 8.4% 7.5% 7.8% 8.4% 18.6% 21.0% 23.6%
Another Race Category 0.8% 2.8% 2.3% 1.9% 1.5% 7.5% 3.0%
White 74.2% 74.2% 74.4% 72.6% 29.9% 28.0% 30.6%
Response rate Not applicable 61.3% 56.9% 63.0% 99.1% 98% 100%
Total participants Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable 1052 943 988

Notes:

Data on the socio-demographic profile of participants was collected voluntarily from employees at the application stage for the 2018-2019, 2019-2020 and 2020-2021 program cycles. The overall response rate for participants was:

  • 99.1% in 2018
  • 98% in 2019
  • 100% in 2020

Data is point-in-time with varying completion rates by socio-demographic question.

See Appendix B for additional notes.

Socio-demographic profile of participants in Leadership Development Programs, 2018-2020

These visualizations summarize the socio-demographic profile of participants in both the OPS Advancing into Management Program and the OPS Leadership Development Program.
Note: This figure is for visual reference only. See the tables below this figure for the full data.

Women

2018

52.6%

2019

62.5%

2020

59.0%

Men

2018

36.8%

2019

31.2%

2020

33.8%

Non-binary and/or Two-Spirit

2018

0.0%

2019

0.0%

2020

0.0%

Francophone

2018

2.6%

2019

5.9%

2020

6.6%

Indigenous

2018

2019

4.4%

2020

5.1%

LGBTQ+

2018

3.2%

2019

9.6%

2020

5.9%

Asexual

2018

0.0%

2019

1.4%

2020

1.2%

Bisexual

2018

0.6%

2019

1.4%

2020

0.7%

Gay

2018

1.9%

2019

2.9%

2020

2.9%

Lesbian

2018

0.6%

2019

2.9%

2020

0.0%

Pansexual

2018

0.0%

2019

0.0%

2020

0.0%

Queer

2018

0.0%

2019

0.0%

2020

0.0%

Questioning

2018

0.0%

2019

0.0%

2020

0.0%

Two-spirit

2018

0.0%

2019

0.0%

2020

0.0%

Transgender

2018

N/A

2019

N/A

2020

0.0%

I don’t identify with the above

2018

0.0%

2019

0.0%

2020

0.0%

Straight or heterosexual

2018

81.3%

2019

75.4%

2020

79.1%

Persons with disabilities

2018

5.1%

2019

2.2%

2020

6.6%

Racialized

2018

34.6%

2019

42.6%

2020

44.9%

Black

2018

3.2%

2019

5.9%

2020

11.0%

East / Southeast Asian

2018

9.6%

2019

12.5%

2020

11.0%

Middle Eastern

2018

6.4%

2019

3.7%

2020

5.1%

Latino / Latina / Latinx

2018

2019

2020

2.2%

South Asian

2018

14.1%

2019

14.7%

2020

17.6%

Another race category

2018

3.2%

2019

2.2%

2020

2.2%

White

2018

57.1%

2019

64.7%

2020

48.5%

The following table summarizes the socio-demographic profile of participants in both the OPS Advancing into Management Program and the OPS Leadership Development Program.

OPS socio-demographic profile of participants in Leadership Development Programs, 2018-2020
OPS socio-demographic profile of participants in Leadership Development Programs, 2018-2020 Ontario labour force 2016/2017 OPS 2018 OPS 2019 OPS 2021 Leadership Development Programs 2018 Leadership Development Programs 2019 Leadership Development Programs 2020

Gender identity

Men 51.7% 39.5% 40.9% 38.9% 36.8% 31.2% 33.8%
Non-Binary and/or Two-Spirit N/A 0.4% 0.4% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Women 48.3% 60.1% 58.8% 60.6% 52.6% 62.5% 59.0%
Francophone 4.0% 7.1% 6.9% 6.9% 2.6% 5.9% 6.6%
LGBTQ+ N/A 11.8% 13.0% 12.2% 3.2% 9.6% 5.9%

Sexual orientation

Straight or Heterosexual 97.3% 88.2% 87.0% 87.1% 81.3% 75.4% 79.1%
Asexual Not applicable 4.9% 6.4% 5.8% 0.0% 1.4% 2.2%
Bisexual Not applicable 1.9% 2.0% 2.7% 0.6% 1.4% 0.7%
Gay Not applicable 1.8% 1.7% 1.8% 1.9% 2.9% 2.9%
Lesbian Not applicable 1.0% 0.9% 0.9% 0.6% 2.9% 0.0%
Pansexual Not applicable N/A 0.3% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Queer Not applicable N/A 0.4% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Questioning Not applicable 0.3% 0.3% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Two-Spirit Not applicable N/A 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Transgender N/A N/A N/A 0.4% N/A N/A 0.0%
Persons with disabilities 16.7% 12.1% 13.2% 13.2% 5.1% 2.2% 6.6%
Indigenous 2.5% 2.6% 2.8% 2.6% **footnote 2 4.4% 5.1%
Racialized 28.3% 22.8% 23.2% 25.4% 34.6% 42.6% 44.9%

Race categories

Black 4.5% 5.4% 5.2% 5.9% 3.2% 5.9% 11.0%
East/Southeast Asian 9.9% 7.9% 8.1% 8.6% 9.6% 12.5% 11.0%
Latino/Latina/Latinx 1.7% 1.4% 1.5% 1.5% **footnote 2 **footnote 2 2.2%
Middle Eastern 2.3% 1.7% 1.8% 1.9% 6.4% 3.7% 5.1%
South Asian 8.4% 7.5% 7.8% 8.4% 14.1% 14.7% 17.6%
Another Race Category 0.8% 2.8% 2.3% 1.9% 3.2% 2.2% 2.2%
White 74.2% 74.2% 74.4% 72.6% 57.1% 64.7% 48.5%
Response rate Not applicable 61.3% 56.9% 63.0% 96.8% 92.8% 97.8%
Total participants Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable 156 136 139

Notes:

Data is combined from the participant profiles of two OPS-wide programs: Advancing into Management and the Leadership Development Program. Ministry-led programs are not included in this analysis.

Participants in the Advancing into Management program are nominated by their ministries and must be identified as a successor to a manager-level position.

Participants in the Leadership Development Program are invited to participate after completing the Senior Leadership Potential Assessment (SLPA). SLPA participants are nominated by their ministry and must be identified as a successor to a director-level position.

Data is based on voluntary socio-demographic information offered by program participants. Data is point-in-time with varying completion rates by socio-demographic question. The overall response rates were:

  • 96.1% in 2018
  • 92.8% in 2019
  • 97.8% in 2020

Cells are empty and marked by a double asterisk (**) if there are fewer than five respondents. The data is supressed due to a low sample to avoid potential identification of individuals and to protect privacy.

See Appendix B for additional notes.

Socio-demographic profile of successors, 2019-2021

The visualization shows socio-demographic data that was collected anonymously and voluntarily by ministries in 2019 and 2020 from people who were successors for executive roles within their ministries.
Note: This figure is for visual reference only. See the tables below this figure for the full data.

Women

2019

64.8%

2020

68.3%

Men

2019

32.9%

2020

29.6%

Non-binary and/or Two-Spirit

2019

0.2%

2020

0.3%

Francophone

2019

5.3%

2020

6.4%

Indigenous

2019

2.2%

2020

1.8%

LGBTQ+

2019

9.1%

2020

8.1%

Asexual

2019

2.9%

2020

1.6%

Bisexual

2019

1.6%

2020

1.6%

Gay

2019

2.4%

2020

2.8%

Lesbian

2019

1.2%

2020

0.6%

Pansexual

2019

0.2%

2020

0.1%

Queer

2019

1.0%

2020

1.3%

Questioning

2019

0.0%

2020

0.3%

Two-spirit

2019

0.0%

2020

0.0%

Transgender

2019

N/A

2020

0.1%

I don’t identify with the above

2019

0.0%

2020

0.1%

Straight or heterosexual

2019

81.4%

2020

84.4%

Persons with disabilities

2019

8.6%

2020

8.4%

Racialized

2019

28.3%

2020

33.4%

Black

2019

5.9%

2020

6.2%

East / Southeast Asian

2019

8.8%

2020

9.2%

Middle Eastern

2019

1.4%

2020

3.8%

Latino / Latina / Latinx

2019

1.6%

2020

1.7%

South Asian

2019

11.4%

2020

14.6%

Another race category

2019

2.1%

2020

3.7%

White

2019

65.9%

2020

60.3%

The following table shares socio-demographic data that was collected anonymously and voluntarily by ministries in 2019 and 2020 from people who were successors for executive roles within their ministries.

OPS socio-demographic profile of successors, 2019-2021
OPS socio-demographic profile of successors, 2019-2021 Ontario labour force 2016/2017 OPS 2018 OPS 2019 OPS 2021 Successors 2019 Successors 2020

Gender identity

Men 51.7% 39.5% 40.9% 38.9% 32.9% 29.6%
Non-Binary and/or Two-Spirit N/A 0.4% 0.4% 0.6% 0.2% 0.3%
Women 48.3% 60.1% 58.8% 60.6% 64.8% 68.3%
Francophone 4.0% 7.1% 6.9% 6.9% 5.3% 6.4%
LGBTQ+ N/A 11.8% 13.0% 12.2% 9.1% 8.1%

Sexual orientation

Straight or Heterosexual 97.3% 88.2% 87.0% 87.1% 81.4% 84.4%
Asexual Not applicable 4.9% 6.4% 5.8% 2.9% 1.6%
Bisexual Not applicable 1.9% 2.0% 2.7% 1.6% 1.6%
Gay Not applicable 1.8% 1.7% 1.8% 2.4% 2.8%
Lesbian Not applicable 1.0% 0.9% 0.9% 1.2% 0.6%
Pansexual Not applicable N/A 0.3% 0.5% 0.2% 0.1%
Queer Not applicable N/A 0.4% 0.7% 1.0% 1.3%
Questioning Not applicable 0.3% 0.3% 0.4% 0.0% 0.3%
Two-Spirit Not applicable N/A 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0%
Transgender N/A N/A N/A 0.4% N/A 0.1%
Persons with disabilities 16.7% 12.1% 13.2% 13.2% 8.6% 8.4%
Indigenous 2.5% 2.6% 2.8% 2.6% 2.2% 1.8%
Racialized 28.3% 22.8% 23.2% 25.4% 28.3% 33.4%

Race categories

Black 4.5% 5.4% 5.2% 5.9% 5.9% 6.2%
East/Southeast Asian 9.9% 7.9% 8.1% 8.6% 8.8% 9.2%
Latino/Latina/Latinx 1.7% 1.4% 1.5% 1.5% 1.6% 1.7%
Middle Eastern 2.3% 1.7% 1.8% 1.9% 1.4% 3.8%
South Asian 8.4% 7.5% 7.8% 8.4% 11.4% 14.6%
Another Race Category 0.8% 2.8% 2.3% 1.9% 2.1% 3.7%
White 74.2% 74.2% 74.4% 72.6% 65.9% 60.3%
Response rate Not applicable 61.3% 56.9% 63.0% 60.0% 67.2%
Survey respondents Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable 580 706

Notes:

For 2020-21 results, 17 out of 24 ministries sent a socio-demographic survey to a total of 1,051 identified successors between January and April 2021. The survey received a 67.2% response rate.

This data represents people who were notified they were identified as a potential successor, and who confirmed their interest in being a successor through the OPS Talent Management System, as well as other successors tracked by ministries.

See Appendix B for additional notes.

Socio-demographic profile of people shortlisted for senior manager positions, 2019-2021

This visualization shows socio-demographic data that was collected on a voluntary basis from people who were shortlisted for senior manager roles in 2019-2020 and 2020-2021.
Note: This figure is for visual reference only. See the tables below this figure for the full data.
  • Women

    • Managers
      • 2019
        • Shortlists: 61.8%  
        • Successful candidates: N/A  
      • 2020
        • Shortlists: 59.9%  
        • Successful candidates: 61.7%  
    • Executives
      • 2019
        • Shortlists: 63.7%  
        • Successful candidates: 67.5%  
      • 2020
        • Shortlists: 60.6%  
        • Successful candidates: 57.4%  
  • Men

    • Managers
      • 2019
        • Shortlists: 34.3%  
        • Successful candidates: N/A  
      • 2020
        • Shortlists: 33.9%  
        • Successful candidates: 36.7%  
    • Executives
      • 2019
        • Shortlists: 34.2%  
        • Successful candidates: 31.3%  
      • 2020
        • Shortlists: 39.0%  
        • Successful candidates: 42.6%  
  • Non-binary and/or Two-Spirit

    • Managers
      • 2019
        • Shortlists: 0.0%  
        • Successful candidates: N/A  
      • 2020
        • Shortlists: 0.0%  
        • Successful candidates: 0.0%  
    • Executives
      • 2019
        • Shortlists: 0.4%  
        • Successful candidates: 0.0%  
      • 2020
        • Shortlists: 0.0%  
        • Successful candidates: 0.0%  
  • Francophone

    • Managers
      • 2019
        • Shortlists: 5.9%  
        • Successful candidates: N/A  
      • 2020
        • Shortlists: 8.5%  
        • Successful candidates: 13.3%  
    • Executives
      • 2019
        • Shortlists: 4.0%  
        • Successful candidates: 3.0%  
      • 2020
        • Shortlists: 7.7%  
        • Successful candidates: 11.7%  
  • Indigenous

    • Managers
      • 2019
      • 2020
        • Shortlists: 2.2%  
        • Successful candidates: 3.3%  
    • Executives
      • 2019
        • Shortlists: 3.0%  
        • Successful candidates: 4.0%  
      • 2020
        • Shortlists: 2.6%  
        • Successful candidates: 7.4%  
  • LGBTQ+

    • Managers
      • 2019
        • Shortlists: 11.8%  
        • Successful candidates: N/A  
      • 2020
        • Shortlists: 12.8%  
        • Successful candidates: 11.7%  
    • Executives
      • 2019
        • Shortlists: 9.0%  
        • Successful candidates: 8.0%  
      • 2020
        • Shortlists: 10.0%  
        • Successful candidates: 10.3%  
  • Asexual

    • Managers
      • 2019
        • Shortlists: 1.0%  
        • Successful candidates: N/A  
      • 2020
        • Shortlists: 3.8%  
        • Successful candidates: 0.0%  
    • Executives
      • 2019
        • Shortlists: 1.1%  
        • Successful candidates: 1.3%  
      • 2020
        • Shortlists: 1.9%  
        • Successful candidates: 2.9%  
  • Bisexual

    • Managers
      • 2019
        • Shortlists: 2.0%  
        • Successful candidates: N/A  
      • 2020
        • Shortlists: 3.8%  
        • Successful candidates: 5.0%  
    • Executives
      • 2019
        • Shortlists: 2.8%  
        • Successful candidates: 2.5%  
      • 2020
        • Shortlists: 2.8%  
        • Successful candidates: 2.9%  
  • Gay

    • Managers
      • 2019
        • Shortlists: 3.9%  
        • Successful candidates: N/A  
      • 2020
        • Shortlists: 3.4%  
        • Successful candidates: 1.7%  
    • Executives
      • 2019
        • Shortlists: 2.5%  
        • Successful candidates: 1.3%  
      • 2020
        • Shortlists: 3.0%  
        • Successful candidates: 2.9%  
  • Lesbian

    • Managers
      • 2019
        • Shortlists: 0.0%  
        • Successful candidates: N/A  
      • 2020
        • Shortlists: 0.2%  
        • Successful candidates: 0.0%  
    • Executives
      • 2019
        • Shortlists: 0.0%  
        • Successful candidates: 0.0%  
      • 2020
        • Shortlists: 0.0%  
        • Successful candidates: 0.0%  
  • Pansexual

    • Managers
      • 2019
        • Shortlists: 1.0%  
        • Successful candidates: N/A  
      • 2020
        • Shortlists: 0.2%  
        • Successful candidates: 0.0%  
    • Executives
      • 2019
        • Shortlists: 0.0%  
        • Successful candidates: 0.0%  
      • 2020
        • Shortlists: 0.0%  
        • Successful candidates: 0.0%  
  • Queer

    • Managers
      • 2019
        • Shortlists: 2.9%  
        • Successful candidates: N/A  
      • 2020
        • Shortlists: 0.5%  
        • Successful candidates: 1.7%  
    • Executives
      • 2019
        • Shortlists: 0.0%  
        • Successful candidates: 0.0%  
      • 2020
        • Shortlists: 0.2%  
        • Successful candidates: 0.0%  
  • Questioning

    • Managers
      • 2019
        • Shortlists: 0.0%  
        • Successful candidates: N/A  
      • 2020
        • Shortlists: 0.5%  
        • Successful candidates: 1.7%  
    • Executives
      • 2019
        • Shortlists: 0.0%  
        • Successful candidates: 0.0%  
      • 2020
        • Shortlists: 0.0%  
        • Successful candidates: 0.0%  
  • Two-spirit

    • Managers
      • 2019
        • Shortlists: 0.0%  
        • Successful candidates: N/A  
      • 2020
        • Shortlists: 0.0%  
        • Successful candidates: 0.0%  
    • Executives
      • 2019
        • Shortlists: 0.0%  
        • Successful candidates: 0.0%  
      • 2020
        • Shortlists: 0.0%  
        • Successful candidates: 0.0%  
  • I don’t identify with the above

    • Managers
      • 2019
        • Shortlists: 0.0%  
        • Successful candidates: N/A  
      • 2020
        • Shortlists: 0.0%  
        • Successful candidates: 0.0%  
    • Executives
      • 2019
        • Shortlists: 1.1%  
        • Successful candidates: 0.0%  
      • 2020
        • Shortlists: 0.9%  
        • Successful candidates: 0.0%  
  • Straight or heterosexual

    • Managers
      • 2019
        • Shortlists: 80.4%  
        • Successful candidates: N/A  
      • 2020
        • Shortlists: 76.5%  
        • Successful candidates: 80.0%  
    • Executives
      • 2019
        • Shortlists: 84.7%  
        • Successful candidates: 81.3%  
      • 2020
        • Shortlists: 85.4%  
        • Successful candidates: 86.8%  
  • Transgender

    • Managers
      • 2019
        • Shortlists: N/A  
        • Successful candidates: N/A  
      • 2020
        • Shortlists: 0.0%  
        • Successful candidates: 0.0%  
    • Executives
      • 2019
        • Shortlists: N/A  
        • Successful candidates: N/A  
      • 2020
        • Shortlists: 0.0%  
        • Successful candidates: 0.0%  
  • Persons with disabilities

    • Managers
      • 2019
        • Shortlists: 14.7%  
        • Successful candidates: N/A  
      • 2020
        • Shortlists: 7.4%  
        • Successful candidates: 3.3%  
    • Executives
      • 2019
        • Shortlists: 8.0%  
        • Successful candidates: 9.0%  
      • 2020
        • Shortlists: 8.4%  
        • Successful candidates: 7.4%  
  • Racialized

    • Managers
      • 2019
        • Shortlists: 41.2%  
        • Successful candidates: N/A  
      • 2020
        • Shortlists: 48.2%  
        • Successful candidates: 35.0%  
    • Executives
      • 2019
        • Shortlists: 27.0%  
        • Successful candidates: 25.0%  
      • 2020
        • Shortlists: 32.9%  
        • Successful candidates: 30.9%  
  • Black

    • Managers
      • 2019
        • Shortlists: 4.9%  
        • Successful candidates: N/A  
      • 2020
        • Shortlists: 10.8%  
        • Successful candidates: 5.0%  
    • Executives
      • 2019
        • Shortlists: 4.0%  
        • Successful candidates: 8.0%  
      • 2020
        • Shortlists: 10.7%  
        • Successful candidates: 8.8%  
  • East / Southeast Asian

    • Managers
      • 2019
        • Shortlists: 10.8%  
        • Successful candidates: N/A  
      • 2020
        • Shortlists: 13.4%  
        • Successful candidates: 15.0%  
    • Executives
      • 2019
        • Shortlists: 6.0%  
        • Successful candidates: 4.0%  
      • 2020
        • Shortlists: 7.4%  
        • Successful candidates: 8.8%  
  • Latino / Latina / Latinx

    • Managers
      • 2019
      • 2020
        • Shortlists: 1.8%  
        • Successful candidates: 0.0%  
    • Executives
      • 2019
        • Shortlists: 1.0%  
        • Successful candidates: 1.0%  
      • 2020
        • Shortlists: 1.4%  
        • Successful candidates: 2.9%  
  • Middle Eastern

    • Managers
      • 2019
        • Shortlists: 4.9%  
        • Successful candidates: N/A  
      • 2020
        • Shortlists: 5.6%  
        • Successful candidates: 5.0%  
    • Executives
      • 2019
        • Shortlists: 2.0%  
        • Successful candidates: 1.0%  
      • 2020
        • Shortlists: 3.2%  
        • Successful candidates: 0.0%  
  • South Asian

    • Managers
      • 2019
        • Shortlists: 17.6%  
        • Successful candidates: N/A  
      • 2020
        • Shortlists: 18.4%  
        • Successful candidates: 11.7%  
    • Executives
      • 2019
        • Shortlists: 12.0%  
        • Successful candidates: 10.0%  
      • 2020
        • Shortlists: 9.5%  
        • Successful candidates: 8.8%  
  • Another race category

    • Managers
      • 2019
      • 2020
        • Shortlists: 0.2%  
        • Successful candidates: 0.0%  
    • Executives
      • 2019
        • Shortlists: 1.0%  
        • Successful candidates: 0.0%  
      • 2020
        • Shortlists: 0.0%  
        • Successful candidates: 1.5%  
  • White

    • Managers
      • 2019
        • Shortlists: 54.9%  
        • Successful candidates: N/A  
      • 2020
        • Shortlists: 52.0%  
        • Successful candidates: 66.7%  
    • Executives
      • 2019
        • Shortlists: 67.0%  
        • Successful candidates: 74.0%  
      • 2020
        • Shortlists: 64.4%  
        • Successful candidates: 69.1%  

The following tables share socio-demographic data that was collected on a voluntary basis from people who were shortlisted for senior manager roles in 2019-2020 and 2020-2021.

OPS socio-demographic profile of people shortlisted for senior manager positions, 2019-2021
OPS socio-demographic profile of of people shortlisted for senior manager positions, 2019-2021 Ontario labour force 2016/2017 OPS 2018 OPS 2019 OPS 2021 Manager shortlists 2019 Manager shortlists 2020 Manager successful candidates 2020

Gender identity

Men 51.7% 39.5% 40.9% 38.9% 34.3% 33.9% 36.7%
Non-Binary and/or Two-Spirit N/A 0.4% 0.4% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Women 48.3% 60.1% 58.8% 60.6% 61.8% 59.9% 61.7%
Francophone 4.0% 7.1% 6.9% 6.9% 5.9% 8.5% 13.3%
LGBTQ+ N/A 11.8% 13.0% 12.2% 11.8% 12.8% 11.7%

Sexual orientation

Straight or Heterosexual 97.3% 88.2% 87.0% 87.1% 80.4% 76.5% 80.0%
Asexual Not applicable 4.9% 6.4% 5.8% 1.0% 3.8% 0.0%
Bisexual Not applicable 1.9% 2.0% 2.7% 2.0% 3.8% 5.0%
Gay Not applicable 1.8% 1.7% 1.8% 3.9% 3.4% 1.7%
Lesbian Not applicable 1.0% 0.9% 0.9% 0.0% 0.7% 1.7%
Pansexual Not applicable N/A 0.3% 0.5% 1.0% 0.2% 0.0%
Queer Not applicable N/A 0.4% 0.7% 2.9% 0.5% 1.7%
Questioning Not applicable 0.3% 0.3% 0.4% 0.0% 0.5% 1.7%
Two-Spirit Not applicable N/A 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Transgender N/A N/A N/A 0.4% N/A 0.0% 0.0%
Persons with disabilities 16.7% 12.1% 13.2% 13.2% 14.7% 7.4% 3.3%
Indigenous 2.5% 2.6% 2.8% 2.6% **footnote 3 2.2% 3.3%
Racialized 28.3% 22.8% 23.2% 25.4% 41.2% 48.2% 35.0%

Race categories

Black 4.5% 5.4% 5.2% 5.9% 4.9% 10.8% 5.0%
East/Southeast Asian 9.9% 7.9% 8.1% 8.6% 10.8% 13.4% 15.0%
Latino/Latina/Latinx 1.7% 1.4% 1.5% 1.5% **footnote 3 1.8% 0.0%
Middle Eastern 2.3% 1.7% 1.8% 1.9% 4.9% 5.6% 5.0%
South Asian 8.4% 7.5% 7.8% 8.4% 17.6% 18.4% 11.7%
Another Race Category 0.8% 2.8% 2.3% 1.9% **footnote 3 0.2% 0.0%
White 74.2% 74.2% 74.4% 72.6% 54.9% 52.0% 66.7%
Response rate Not applicable 61.3% 56.9% 63.0% 56.0% 52.0% 46.9%

Notes:

Data for people shortlisted for senior manager positions was collected between April 2019 and March 2020 across 58 job competitions from 102 respondents representing an overall response rate of 56%. This represents 34.5% of all senior manager competitions held during that same period. Data on successful candidates is not known because the 2019-20 survey was anonymous.

Between April 2020 and March 2021, data was collected as part of 133 senior manager competitions with 2,713 applicant respondents representing an overall response rate of 52% at the shortlisted candidate stage.

This data only includes formally tracked senior manager competitions and does not include direct appointments. Cells are empty and marked by a double asterisk (**) to indicate supressed data due to a low sample and to avoid potential identification of individuals. See Appendix B for additional notes.

Socio-demographic profile of people shortlisted for executive positions, 2019-2021

The following tables share socio-demographic data that was collected on a voluntary basis from people who were shortlisted for executive roles in 2019-2020 and 2020-2021. Results for successful candidates are also provided.

OPS socio-demographic profile of people shortlisted for executive positions, 2019-2021
OPS socio-demographic profile of people shortlisted for executive positions, 2019-2021 Ontario labour force 2016/2017 OPS 2018 OPS 2019 OPS 2021 Executive shortlists 2019 Executive successful candidates 2019 Executive shortlists 2020 Executive successful candidates 2020

Gender identity

Men 51.7% 39.5% 40.9% 38.9% 34.2% 31.3% 39.0% 42.6%
Non-Binary and/or Two-Spirit N/A 0.4% 0.4% 0.6% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Women 48.3% 60.1% 58.8% 60.6% 63.7% 67.5% 60.6% 57.4%
Francophone 4.0% 7.1% 6.9% 6.9% 4.0% 3.0% 7.7% 11.7%
LGBTQ+ N/A 11.8% 13.0% 12.2% 9.0% 8.0% 10.0% 10.3%

Sexual orientation

Straight or Heterosexual 97.3% 88.2% 87.0% 87.1% 84.7% 81.3% 85.4% 86.8%
Asexual Not applicable 4.9% 6.4% 5.8% 1.1% 1.3% 1.9% 2.9%
Bisexual Not applicable 1.9% 2.0% 2.7% 2.8% 2.5% 2.8% 2.9%
Gay Not applicable 1.8% 1.7% 1.8% 2.5% 1.3% 3.0% 2.9%
Lesbian Not applicable 1.0% 0.9% 0.9% 1.4% 2.5% 1.6% 1.5%
Pansexual Not applicable N/A 0.3% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Queer Not applicable N/A 0.4% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0%
Questioning Not applicable 0.3% 0.3% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Two-Spirit Not applicable N/A 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Transgender N/A N/A N/A 0.4% N/A N/A 0.0% 0.0%
Persons with disabilities 16.7% 12.1% 13.2% 13.2% 8.0% 9.0% 8.4% 7.4%
Indigenous 2.5% 2.6% 2.8% 2.6% 3.0% 4.0% 2.6% 7.4%
Racialized 28.3% 22.8% 23.2% 25.4% 27.0% 25.0% 32.9% 30.9%

Race categories

Black 4.5% 5.4% 5.2% 5.9% 4.0% 8.0% 10.7% 8.8%
East/Southeast Asian 9.9% 7.9% 8.1% 8.6% 6.0% 4.0% 7.4% 8.8%
Latino/Latina/Latinx 1.7% 1.4% 1.5% 1.5% 1.0% 1.0% 1.4% 2.9%
Middle Eastern 2.3% 1.7% 1.8% 1.9% 2.0% 1.0% 3.2% 0.0%
South Asian 8.4% 7.5% 7.8% 8.4% 12.0% 10.0% 9.5% 8.8%
Another Race Category 0.8% 2.8% 2.3% 1.9% 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.5%
White 74.2% 74.2% 74.4% 72.6% 67.0% 74.0% 64.4% 69.1%
Response rate Not applicable 61.3% 56.9% 63.0% 63.0% Not applicable 60.0% Not applicable

Notes:

Data for people shortlisted for executive roles was collected between April 2019 and February 2020 with an overall response rate of 63%. Data for people shortlisted for executive roles in 2020-21 was collected from April 2020 to February 2021 with an overall response rate of 60%.

This data only includes formally tracked executive staffing activity facilitated through Treasury Board Secretariat. Cells are empty and marked by a double asterisk (**) to indicate supressed data due to a low sample and to avoid potential identification of individuals and to protect privacy. See Appendix B for additional notes.

Opportunities for leadership positions

The following table shows the number of opportunities (meaning, positions that were filled) that could have been leveraged in 2019-20 and 2020-21 to diversify leadership teams across the OPS.

The number of opportunities calculates promotional moves, hires and re-hires over a 12-month period. These are the types of hiring activities that can change the makeup of senior leadership – promoting individuals into leadership or hiring individuals external to the OPS. The counts do not include lateral moves or promotions from one executive level (for example, from Exec 2 to Exec 3) as these moves do not change the overall socio-demographic makeup of OPS leadership.

Percentages in parenthesis represent the proportion of total number of opportunities relative to the total number of positions at each level.

Opportunities for leadership positions
Opportunities for leadership positions Senior manager Executives
2019-20 total positions 5,310 1,011
2019-20 total opportunities 548 (10.3%) 139 (13.7%)
2020-21 total positions 6,118 983
2020-21 total opportunities 584 (9.5%) 156 (15.9%)

Results for ministry pathway targets

Ministries set five-year targets that align to the OPS’ 2025 goal. Pathway targets are creating access for underrepresented talent to participate in the four pathways that typically lead to senior leadership. Ministries report annually on their targets, which helps in determining whether ministries are setting realistic and achievable commitments and to identify areas that require more tools and supports.

The data below shows the extent to which ministries met their annual targets in the last two years.

Results for ministry pathway targets
Year Total target set Target exceeded Target met Target in progress Target not met
2019-20 190 59 (31.1%) 58 (30.5%) 57 (30%) 16 (8.4%)
2020-21 182 86 (47.3%) 63 (34.6%) 29 (15.9%) 4 (2.2%)

Footnotes

  • footnote[2] Back to paragraph Cells are empty and marked by a double asterisk (**) if there are fewer than five respondents. The data is suppressed due to a low sample to avoid potential identification of individuals and to protect privacy.
  • footnote[3] Back to paragraph Cells are empty and marked by a double asterisk (**) to indicate suppressed data due to a low sample and to avoid potential identification of individuals.